EnochLight wrote: ↑27 Jan 2021
joeyluck wrote: ↑27 Jan 2021
People now have options. It's up to the user to decide the best path, but we simply have more options. So I don't get your argument.
That's because apparently we are "Reason apologists" or "corporate protectionists".
I can totally appreciate the sarcasm here but as the person who you are likely quoting, I think those labels/terms are apt and not necessarily incendiary. There is truth to the ideas I presented in support of those labels. I've always wanted to engage with this community more but didn't due to the echo chamber effect I saw here and on PUF. So much criticism is met with shut downs and deflection.
The whole culture of dismissing valid complaints of others because you might be fine with the choices being disputed is somewhat dicey. Reason is famous for tons of threads and chats overwhelmed with people on both sides but almost always a negative majority. We see it happening in the gaming world A LOT and lots of other markets too. Adobe being one of the famous abusive relationships consumers have with a corporate entity. Companies listen far too selectively. The ones who do listen always eventually falter under their own success and then go against their own ethos to get that sweet cash.
Unhappiness is and always will be louder. The difference is those expressing discontent have a duty to do so, for their own interests and to secure a future of continuing to enjoy what they love. Reason. It is clearly being threatened by new business models from outsider VC mindsets that don't guarantee RS long term success. Investors are not always right. Let's hope they are in this case, of course.
that said, the whole "too bad you can leave attitude" that I oft see on threads here or elsewhere are concerning. People defending or justifying bad company decisions is largely the problem I see with getting them to listen to us. They see your supportive comments and then feel vindicated in their choices. Complimented of course by their fat bottom line!
See, saying "it's always been this way" or "so just don't buy it then" or "there's the door" is kind of one and the same to the responses made to legitimate political complaints and strife in society. The classic American "then leave" is metaphorically the same logic. We vote with our dollars but just like voting in the US, that is clearly not enough to secure the needs of the people/user base.
It's the sanitization of thought and opinion that comes with online moderation and group think that I feel lead us as a society into this lousy state the world is now in. Heck I'm even afraid to impart my "entitled opinion" directly to any moderator. Wouldn't want to get banned. I don't think I've crossed that line but with everything going on in this world, it is clearly an increasingly slippery slope.
Sadly, it is all connected. Our collective musical hobbies now vastly depend on maintaining large capitalist structures and systems, it all becomes quite dreary, if you ask me. So I don't necessarily disagree with yours and others more logical, optimistic outlook. That said those who are angry are passionate for a reason. there is a lot of love behind our angry voices but it does not and hasn't felt reciprocated for a little while now because of the changes going on in the software space.
Point is, as long as the discourse can continue, your eye rolls towards my hyperbole are 100% acceptable just as our claims that people should stop defending unjust moves by companies.
It's been a fun day of moaning and I think I got it out of my system and now all we can do is wait and see how things play out!