Is this for real? I don't come here very often but if this is for real, I will now because this thread calls for popcorn! Well, for HOLY POPCORN, that is!

selig wrote:Funny thing - not working on my iPad, so my confidence in Google vs Propellerhead isn't inspired much by this so far…

It works if you rotate your iPad to portrait mode. Unless you are talking about Reason, which doesn't work on my iPad either.

Some Desperate Glory wrote:Wow. That is some seriously high-quality for a first album. Respect!

Well, I did buy Meco's Star Wars and Other Galactic Funk the week after!

Bought this when I was 10 in 1978. I guess I can say it is all their fault in the end.

EnochLight wrote:D'oh! Sorry about that. The poll has a maximum of 10 choices, so I grouped 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 together. Thanks for pointing that out!

Good, now that you've edited it, I can cast my vote. Thanks.

Do drop by every now and then, Theo, you are a fine feller.

Same as motuscott... Can't vote...

Only the good, only the good...

RIP Michel

BonsaiMacKay wrote: I think he means that as in "uncontrollably excited" (second entry, definition 1).

eusti wrote:
Cool! Thanks! That is a usage I never experienced in real life! Learned something new today!

D.

I see you also foam at the mouth about learning new stuff!

So basically, the instrument and the process should be a  selling point not a  secret .  8-) Very true, I mean when I look at the Reason Pianos, or Kontakt Alicia Keys blurb, the way they explain what microphone and preamps were used to capture each piano, the pickup positions and naming the engine...

Part of the thing that sells me on any sampled product are all the pictures of the instruments that have been sampled, the studio in which it was recorded, which (usually vintage) mics, pres, and desks were used and any processing applied. Basically a lot of companies have this down to a T, and by ...

Part of the thing that sells me on any sampled product are all the pictures of the instruments that have been sampled, the studio in which it was recorded, which (usually vintage) mics, pres, and desks were used and any processing applied. Basically a lot of companies have this down to a T, and by ...

Well, as usual, Matt has dug himself a hole he can't get out of anymore.

This thread reminds of the Kong808/909 thread. Ask the simplest question in the world and never get an answer. Honestly, if I didn't know it was Matt, I'd say it's a scam.

That's Propellerhead! The shop will change with the new SDK...

True but spamming it with silly threads and proselytism won't.

Namahs Amrak wrote:
But trees are meant to touch the sky
Not on dishes of ceramic blue dye
And they never get moved around
Their home is stationary, into ground

G'day, Karma.

BonsaiMcKay wrote:I'm in!

Arsenic wrote:
Welcome Mr. Bonez. Good to see you here.....

Glad to see you here, Arsenic!

Julibee wrote:Ha! BonsaiMcKay.... First I've seen you, Bonez. Cheers!

Cheers, Julz! Really enjoying the good vibes of this place.

Failed Muso wrote: Just another thought/suggestion...
Would it be useful to have a section dedicated to discussion of non Reason music making tools? Hardware, plug ins, etc?

Totally!

Good to see familiar faces. This forum will hopefully be better than the old PUF. Now lemme git that popcorn!

I am getting two Moog Minifoogers: Ring and Drive
 
 

I'm in! And I'm only in it for the drama!  :s0826: