Do not even try to refute. Ladness made to measure noise.
And the Double bass with flute, will become for you a nightmare, and for all of your followers.

Crest factor is not "talking" about anything. But I find it a better judge of loudness than peak or VU/RMS levels alone. I would defer to mastering engineers when I need to meet a professional standard (which to date has NEVER happened). I don't know that "we" need anything. I will repeat that I sh...

But you've just made the point that the genre determines the "sound", not the loudness, right? My point is that loudness for the sake of loudness has consequences. I agree with your point that a signature style can be anything, including distortion. I assert there is no longer such a thing as a "lo...

But Reason that does not, for 6 years. It's not on alihoopa I am using live samples and crest factor of 10 decibels -1 dB peak. Next I hear electronic tracks. On alihoopa. They are close and they are louder 3-5 decibels. And I cry. Our Challenge is also not regulated. Oh yes, our Challenge have an a...

I am ready to make an example for this purpose. But not now. I'm going to limit its presence on the forum. Because of the constant wrangling I keep getting warnings. And my personal example will be criticized. :puf_bigsmile: I do not think this is extreme. gate method retains all the audio informat...

I can add that laudness, pushed me to use isotope often. Not only on the master. I do the gate G8 method on each track, by using the isotope. And I can see the difference. I started doing less rigid compression. Why do you only start to hear something when you read a meter? You should hear how good...

I can add that laudness, pushed me to use isotope often.
Not only on the master.
I do the gate G8 method on each track, by using the isotope. And I can see the difference.
I started doing less rigid compression.

to everyone i think it is my fault why we went off the topic because i was asking about how to use/read the volume meters in SSL for mixdown (i did not know how they measureed). fwiw selig has helped me significantly to understand how to read the meters and given me his view on suggested peak level...

Of course it hurts me to hear that it was not for the music, and for broadcasting. It squeezes my heart. What's the difference? What Florian not a producer? I hate the producers, they produce a mass indistinguishable from the background music. I'm not interested in the fight between the broadcasters...

I since 2011 experimenting with R 128 for music. *I can give an example of a broadcast application in the mix: your mixer channels, and bus groups. This is the program audio. *In addition the principle of moments and short measurement - it's magic. This applies to balance the sounds of different len...

I work with headphones.
And we forget about the new feature developed by TC Electronics.
It LRA.
Completely new data about the sound.

The point is not 0 Lu. It is your own business.
But within the meaning of the g8 gate method.
And a lot of people are doing just noise and not music.

For example, an interesting meter.

79 parties supporting EBU R 128 in products/tools.* AccepT, Adobe, Agama, Appear TV, Apple, Abdication, Auphonic, Axon, Calrec Audio Ltd, Christian Epe (Silvio), Cobalt Digital, CRC, Cube-Tec International, Digimetrics, DHD, DK-Technologies, Dolby, Dorrough, DSP Mobile, DVBControl, Emotion Systems, ...

LUFS revolution has stalled.

We have a small community. Each user has the right to know what he needed about such complicated things like these "lkfs and lufs" meters. There is not supposed to be three pages with your self-promotion, you create an obstacle to the development of these things. We, the users loudnes important to u...

Laudness - this is not the Broadcasting. This is primarily perception. That is, the audio at all. :) I agree with the video you posted - do you NOT agree with it? I don't understand the point you're trying to make here. [EDIT-According to the video, loudness needs to be measured in order to create ...

Laudness - this is not the Broadcasting. This is primarily perception.
That is, the audio at all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuEtQqC-Sqo thank for video.. i tried to watch but tbh i find much easier when selig explain to me in layman terms :redface: I think Selig should reconsider its tough stance. This is obviously much harm sales, developers Red Rock and Flower Audio. hello 8cros thanks ...

MitchClark89 wrote:

8cros wrote:

thank for video.. i tried to watch but tbh i find much easier when selig explain to me in layman terms

I think Selig should reconsider its tough stance. This is obviously much harm sales, developers Red Rock and Flower Audio.

MitchClark89 wrote:

8cros wrote:

thank for video.. i tried to watch but tbh i find much easier when selig explain to me in layman terms

I can try again if you want.

Of course Selig ignores me. And you can do it too.

Great story man, but could you PLEASE make a thread about whatever it is you're talking about!? No. I no longer fill up the content. ... No? Fair enough. Since I then have no where to move your post to, it's been deleted. Remove then all my posts from this thread. All have read and watched. If this...

Kenni wrote: Great story man, but could you PLEASE make a thread about whatever it is you're talking about!?

No. I no longer fill up the content.

normen wrote:

8cros wrote: I never dogmatic. I am a skeptic and dry practices. I do not even theorist and I pragmatist. I never wrote nonsense in a flat earth. You spoil my image. Now I am blameless.

You seriously have to stop taking things personal.

I never take personally. This public opinion.