Eq in Reason
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 1851
- Joined: 14 Sep 2015
- Location: Paris, France
You can use an MClass Equalizer as an insert effect instead, which has (in addition to hi and lo shelf) two parametric bands, all with Q.
Also you can get a steeper Q by using the E mode.
Cheers!
Fredhoven
Fredhoven
Thanks for the answers. Yeah I will probably have to use the insert effect then.
Its still totally not understandable why a great program like reason does not have a flexible and nice eq on every track like the other 'big' sequencer programs has..
Anyway Thanks
Its still totally not understandable why a great program like reason does not have a flexible and nice eq on every track like the other 'big' sequencer programs has..
Anyway Thanks
Reason makes absolutely no effort to be like other DAWs because its coming from a very different angle. If you want a "standard" DAW, buy one.dr_tolle wrote:Its still totally not understandable why a great program like reason does not have a flexible and nice eq on every track like the other 'big' sequencer programs has..
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Logic and Pro Tools don't have any EQ on the channel. You have to put them on the insert manually.dr_tolle wrote:Thanks for the answers. Yeah I will probably have to use the insert effect then.
Its still totally not understandable why a great program like reason does not have a flexible and nice eq on every track like the other 'big' sequencer programs has..
Anyway Thanks
- Benedict
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 2747
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Contact:
The Reason SSL EQ is very musical and great for intended use of setting parts in the mix.
https://benedictroffmarsh.com/2015/01/2 ... ce-mixing/
https://benedictroffmarsh.com/2015/01/2 ... ce-mixing/
Benedict Roff-Marsh
Completely burned and gone
Completely burned and gone
You can buy GEQ7 as a rack extension, which does what you want an EQ to do.
Cosmopolis, out now: : https://timeslaves.bandcamp.com/album/cosmopolis! Check out the first single, "City Lights:
Sure does. I love that thing!The_G wrote:You can buy GEQ7 as a rack extension, which does what you want an EQ to do.
Perpetual Reason 12 Beta Tester
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
To my knowledge, most DAWs offer several EQs as insert effects. Nevertheless, an "in-the-box" device similar to Studio One's ProEQ would be a nice addition to Reason, in my opinion.dr_tolle wrote:Thanks for the answers. Yeah I will probably have to use the insert effect then.
Its still totally not understandable why a great program like reason does not have a flexible and nice eq on every track like the other 'big' sequencer programs has..
Anyway Thanks
Unfortunately, in spite of Reason's non-sale price tag of $399, a comparable EQ device, such as Synapse GQ-7, must be purchased via the RE shop.
I dont own Studio One, but what makes this EQ so great that it is a must have?txh003 wrote:To my knowledge, most DAWs offer several EQs as insert effects. Nevertheless, an "in-the-box" device similar to Studio One's ProEQ would be a nice addition to Reason, in my opinion.dr_tolle wrote:Thanks for the answers. Yeah I will probably have to use the insert effect then.
Its still totally not understandable why a great program like reason does not have a flexible and nice eq on every track like the other 'big' sequencer programs has..
Anyway Thanks
Unfortunately, in spite of Reason's non-sale price tag of $399, a comparable EQ device, such as Synapse GQ-7, must be purchased via the RE shop.
Reason12, Win10
and how does it soundLoque wrote:I dont own Studio One, but what makes this EQ so great that it is a must have?txh003 wrote:To my knowledge, most DAWs offer several EQs as insert effects. Nevertheless, an "in-the-box" device similar to Studio One's ProEQ would be a nice addition to Reason, in my opinion.dr_tolle wrote:Thanks for the answers. Yeah I will probably have to use the insert effect then.
Its still totally not understandable why a great program like reason does not have a flexible and nice eq on every track like the other 'big' sequencer programs has..
Anyway Thanks
Unfortunately, in spite of Reason's non-sale price tag of $399, a comparable EQ device, such as Synapse GQ-7, must be purchased via the RE shop.
That's because at the highest boost/cut the Q is the same, so it's not going to be a whole lot different except for a small boost/cut amounts. This concept is known as proportional Q, and every EQ that supports this feature does it differently. The EQ in Logic for example has the Q match at 0 dB boost cut rather than max as the SSL does, and then increases the Q from there as you boost/cut. The concept is more about how the curve reacts as you add/subtract gain rather than how tight the Q is overall.dr_tolle wrote:Just tried the E-mode you talked about Gaja. well it helps a little but still not possible to pin out a tight frequency area.
Selig Audio, LLC
What's wrong with the mclass equalizer that comes with reason? I own a couple other RE eqs (although not GQ-7) and still consistently reach for the mclass.txh003 wrote:To my knowledge, most DAWs offer several EQs as insert effects. Nevertheless, an "in-the-box" device similar to Studio One's ProEQ would be a nice addition to Reason, in my opinion.dr_tolle wrote:Thanks for the answers. Yeah I will probably have to use the insert effect then.
Its still totally not understandable why a great program like reason does not have a flexible and nice eq on every track like the other 'big' sequencer programs has..
Anyway Thanks
Unfortunately, in spite of Reason's non-sale price tag of $399, a comparable EQ device, such as Synapse GQ-7, must be purchased via the RE shop.
and if I need more than 2 parametric bells I grab a 2nd MClass EQNeosaki wrote:What's wrong with the mclass equalizer that comes with reason? I own a couple other RE eqs (although not GQ-7) and still consistently reach for the mclass.
mclass will do the job but it's far less featured than S1's Pro EQ and has no freq spectrum.
GQ-7 is very, very nice but expensive for what it is. it can do zipper free dynamic EQ though which is fantastic, and the LP/HP slope options are really impressive.
I'd say buy the GQ-7 if you're committed to reason. or, at least wait until it ends up in a bundle or on sale.
GQ-7 is very, very nice but expensive for what it is. it can do zipper free dynamic EQ though which is fantastic, and the LP/HP slope options are really impressive.
I'd say buy the GQ-7 if you're committed to reason. or, at least wait until it ends up in a bundle or on sale.
- TritoneAddiction
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 4241
- Joined: 29 Aug 2015
- Location: Sweden
Mclass EQ is alright but to my ears GQ-7 sounds cleaner and clearer when boosting (or cutting). I find Mclass to sound a bit harsher. It's a pretty subtle difference but enough to make my ears hear it. Ever since I bought the McDSP EQ bundle and GQ-7 I haven't used Mclass EQ once. Mclass EQ is alright and it gets the job done, it's just that other EQs are "better".Neosaki wrote: What's wrong with the mclass equalizer that comes with reason? I own a couple other RE eqs (although not GQ-7) and still consistently reach for the mclass.
I mostly use the channel strip EQ because it is already there on every channel ... maybe I'm lazy
Me too. I only reach for inserts if the SSL EQ doesn't cut it.Ahornberg wrote:I mostly use the channel strip EQ because it is already there on every channel ... maybe I'm lazy
Cheers!
Fredhoven
Fredhoven
Some other EQs have nice coloring or special EQ curves tgat you cannot replicate with normal EQs. I recommend using them...Ahornberg wrote:I mostly use the channel strip EQ because it is already there on every channel ... maybe I'm lazy
Reason12, Win10
- Exowildebeest
- Posts: 1553
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
It doesn't have any 18db filters, which disappoints me. That slope is so nice for mixing!zakalwe wrote:mclass will do the job but it's far less featured than S1's Pro EQ and has no freq spectrum.
GQ-7 is very, very nice but expensive for what it is. it can do zipper free dynamic EQ though which is fantastic, and the LP/HP slope options are really impressive.
GQ? You can select from i think 12 different slopes up to 96...Exowildebeest wrote:It doesn't have any 18db filters, which disappoints me. That slope is so nice for mixing!zakalwe wrote:mclass will do the job but it's far less featured than S1's Pro EQ and has no freq spectrum.
GQ-7 is very, very nice but expensive for what it is. it can do zipper free dynamic EQ though which is fantastic, and the LP/HP slope options are really impressive.
Reason12, Win10
hey it's synapse so maybe email them if you'd like to see it. they do tend to support their products rather well.Exowildebeest wrote:It doesn't have any 18db filters, which disappoints me. That slope is so nice for mixing!zakalwe wrote:mclass will do the job but it's far less featured than S1's Pro EQ and has no freq spectrum.
GQ-7 is very, very nice but expensive for what it is. it can do zipper free dynamic EQ though which is fantastic, and the LP/HP slope options are really impressive.
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 8 guests